3-19-14 - Talking Past

I encountered a new expression reading the advice column today: “slut shaming,” which I gather is criticizing a woman for sexually provocative dress and behavior (I don’t know whether men can be “slut shamed”... I hope so!) This term made me wonder: Is Jesus “slut-shaming” the Samaritan woman he meets at the well in this week’s gospel story?

Jesus and the woman have been exchanging words; I’m not sure we can call it conversation. They seem to keep talking past each other. He asks her for water; she wonders why he’s willing to ask her. He says if she knew who was asking, she’d be asking him – and that the water he gives never runs out. Then she goes literal – and sarcastic: ‘Okay, so give me this water, so that I may never be thirsty or have to keep coming here to draw water.’

And Jesus changes the subject. Abruptly. “‘Go, call your husband, and come back.’ The woman answered him, ‘I have no husband.’ Jesus said to her, ‘You are right in saying, “I have no husband”; for you have had five husbands, and the one you have now is not your husband. What you have said is true!” If this is meant to shut her up, it doesn’t work: “The woman said to him, ‘Sir, I see that you are a prophet,” and swiftly changes the subject again.

We aren’t told how she felt when Jesus spoke her past to her. He had no earthly way of knowing this about her past, unless she sported tattoos with different men’s names on them. But she doesn’t deny it – and even more significantly, she doesn’t break off the conversation. She changes the subject, sure, launching into a discussion of proper locations for worship… but she doesn’t leave. There must have been something about the way Jesus spoke and looked at her that invited her to be real, not hidden.

I think that is how the Holy Spirit works in us. In some ways, we are to God as wild animals are to humans – skittish, afraid to get too close. And God comes into our lives, sitting down, starting a conversation, which we might do our best to obscure or keep on a surface level of needs and thank yous, so that we can avoid really be known. Only we find out we are in the presence of the One who already knows us, knows everything thing about us, the good, the bad, the ugly – and isn’t walking away.

Have you had that kind of conversation with God lately? Ever? What would you rather Jesus didn’t know about you? Can you bring it up first? Just lay it out there… see how he reacts, what he says?

Chances are, you will come away feeling more accepted and loved than blamed or shamed. To see how this works on a human level, watch a 12-step meeting in action – people are accepted as they tell the worst about themselves, and loved into sobriety. If this can happen with people, imagine how thoroughly God can love us into wholeness as we make ourselves available.

We learn later that this moment with Jesus had an impact, for the woman runs back to her townspeople – the ones whose judgment she was presumably avoiding – and tells them, “Come and see a man who told me everything I ever did!” She has not been shamed. She has been liberated by discovering that the Lord of heaven and earth can know everything about her and still offer love and forgiveness. I hope you have discovered that freedom, more than once. As we receive it, so are we able to give it.

1 comment:

  1. Kate,

    It seems impossible for "slut-shaming" to target men.

    The term isn't used only to register disapproval of provocative clothing. It is especially used to derogate the individual. A rapist who derides his victim as "asking for it" engages in slut-shaming, for example.

    It is especially notable that, whether the abuser is a man or a woman, slut-shaming is always gender specific and directed at women. We don't (except with twisted humor perhaps) refer to men in any context as sluts or anything like it. Can you think of any word aimed at men that has the same impact?

    Such unequal treatment of women (encouraged to be sexually alluring, then criticized for being alluring) is nothing new and it crosses all sorts of cultural boundaries.

    Isn't the same unequal and unjust treatment preserved in French? A man might greet a friend his own age with "Salut, salop, c'a va?" Nobody blinks. Address a woman with the word salope in any sitaution and it always means something very different.

    Hypocritcal double standard. Just as we can all unite in calling out abuse and victimization of women, there is equal need to call men to be proactive in calling out other men who blame women for being victims.

    Thanks for comparing us humans to wild animals. Grrr!

    ReplyDelete